You Slip into the Breaks and Look Around
From Ralph Ellison’s Invisible Man:
Last time I was in NYC, a couple years ago, the MOMA was running a photography exhibit and they had one of Jeff Wall’s wall-size backlit photos. This one was inspired by that creepy prologue to Invisible Man – it showed the narrator in his hole, his back to us, hunched over amid his ragged belongings, dozens or hundreds of lightbulbs sprouting from the walls. It was something to see; I stared at it for a long while, & kept coming back to look at it again, even after I’d moved on to other rooms.
There’s a long & interesting feature on (Vancouver’s own) Wall in the latest New York Times Magazine.
Now I have one radio-phonograph; I plan to have five. There is a certain acoustical deadness in my hole, and when I have music I want to feel its vibration, not only with my ear but with my whole body. I’d like to hear five recordings of Louis Armstrong playing and singing “What Did I Do to Be So Black and Blue” – all at the same time. Sometimes now I listen to Louis while I have my favorite dessert of vanilla ice cream and sloe gin. I pour the red liquid over the white mound, watching it glisten and the vapor rising as Louis bends that military instrument into a beam of lyrical sound. Perhaps I like Louis Armstrong because he’s made poetry out of being invisible. I think it must be because he’s unaware that he is invisible. And my own grasp of invisibility aids me to understand his music. Once when I asked for a cigarette, some jokers gave me a reefer, which I lighted when I got home and sat listening to my phonograph. It was a strange evening. Invisibility, let me explain, gives one a slightly different sense of time, you’re never quite on the beat. Sometimes you’re ahead and sometimes behind. Instead of the swift and imperceptible flowing of time, you are aware of its nodes, those points where time stands still or from which it leaps ahead. And you slip into the breaks and look around. That’s what you hear vaguely in Louis’ music.
Last time I was in NYC, a couple years ago, the MOMA was running a photography exhibit and they had one of Jeff Wall’s wall-size backlit photos. This one was inspired by that creepy prologue to Invisible Man – it showed the narrator in his hole, his back to us, hunched over amid his ragged belongings, dozens or hundreds of lightbulbs sprouting from the walls. It was something to see; I stared at it for a long while, & kept coming back to look at it again, even after I’d moved on to other rooms.
There’s a long & interesting feature on (Vancouver’s own) Wall in the latest New York Times Magazine.
Wall thought big. When he emerged in 1978 as a fully formed artist, he presented photographs that demanded equal status with paintings. In sheer size, they were measured in feet, not inches. He produced them as unique objects, not in editions, and their aura was heightened by the mode of display: enormous transparencies lit from behind by fluorescent bulbs, a “light box” format that was typically used for advertising. Like a commercial light box, a Wall photograph grabbed you with its glowing presence, but then, unlike an advertisement, it held your gaze with the richness of its detail and the harmony of its arrangement. You could study it with the attention you devoted to a Flemish altarpiece in a church, and you could surrender yourself to its spell as if you were in a movie theater.


1 Comments:
Curious that I just discovered Jeff Wall and put his Ellison interpretation on my desktop. Then, I fall on your post, looking for April Stevens...
Coincidence?
Thank you for the book excerpt.
Post a Comment
<< Home